The first half of 2020 is now behind us, but it is a period indelibly etched into our collective memories. We entered this year cantering towards the eleventh year of a bull market, a long rally seemingly impervious to its own impermanence. Of course, it all came to a shuddering halt as the breadth of the Coronavirus pandemic began to register.
The first quarter saw global equities (i.e. MSCI AC World index) fall by 20.4%. Volatility was at an all-time peak; in March, the global equities index moved by more than 3% in any direction 11 times out of 22 trading days. Context is important: prior to 2020, the last time global equities moved by +/- 3% in a single day was in 2016. In this environment – with critical unknowns as to the Coronavirus health consequences or the length of imposed lockdowns – we reduced risk across multi-asset strategies. The drawdown (peak-to-trough loss) in global equity markets at the end of trading on 17-March was about 30%, in line with the average drawdown in global equities over history. Our chief concern at the time was a larger than average drawdown – in 2000 and 2008, drawdowns were about 50%; in 1929, it was over 80%. We also added to defensive positions already held in portfolios, such as gold and government bonds, and braced for whatever came next.
And what came next was nearly as surprising. Despite widespread lockdowns, near-total economic stasis, surging unemployment and a terrible toll in illness and death, the second quarter witnessed a powerful rally in risk assets, with global equities rising by 17.7%.
With the benefit of hindsight, we can synthesise the underpinnings of the rally into two distinct categories.
- First, at the end of March, one of the key unknowns was the length of the lockdowns. In our KHIC Flash Update dated 20-March, we noted: “…economic sudden stops will prove a critical variable: if it is weeks or even a few months, recoveries can be expected to be quick; if the stop lasts longer, there will likely be permanent economic damage.” We now know the lockdowns – where enacted and complied with – worked well and mostly remained in the “few months” range. There was also much better news on the discovery and efficacy of therapeutics and a possible vaccine. All of this has allowed for a controlled exit from lockdown, and a tepid resumption of economic activity.
- Second, governments and central banks unleashed hitherto unthinkable levels of fiscal spending and monetary stimulus to help stabilise economies and provide liquidity to financial markets, backstopping wages and cashflows across entire economies. Once again, with the benefit of hindsight, it is clear it was “enough” to underpin the powerful fillip in markets. It is not without long-term consequences: government debt levels are post-World War II highs and central banks have inadvertently become enormous players in financial markets. Nonetheless, huge government intervention was called for to prevent a near-term collapse, and governments have delivered.
The critical question today, at the advent of the third quarter, is where do markets go from here? Surely, very few would have been able to answer that question with any accuracy at the start of the first quarter or the second. Indeed, volatility remains high, the Coronavirus is still surging across much of the globe – including in the US, the world’s anchor economy. Interestingly, while risk-assets have rallied given the reasons above, safe-haven assets have been equally well bid, with gold trading above $1,800 – a near-decade high – and government bond yields near all-time lows.
It is exactly at times such as these – where uncertainty and imperfect information rule the roost – we must rely on the investment principles which underpin our investment process. Those principles are to get the big decisions right (i.e. the broad weight of risk assets versus safety assets in portfolios); to take risk only when it is likely to be well rewarded (i.e. when valuations for risk assets are attractive); and to avoid large losses (i.e. as they are harder to recover from than shallower losses). At present, this is how we view the world through the lens of our investment process which considers the economic regime plus valuation, momentum, and sentiment signals from markets:
- Economic Regime: Despite significant economic data surprises on the upside, the global economy is on track to suffer its deepest recession since World War II in 2020 according to the World Bank’s latest forecast (8-June), with global output set to contract by 5.2%. Per capita income will fall in the largest proportion of countries globally since 1870. While they are opening, advanced economies are still projected to shrink by 7% this year. In perfect conditions, a rebound may begin as soon as the third quarter. Our inhouse Leading Economic Macro Indicator (LEMI) has just registered an uptick from a regime of "contraction” into one of “recovery”, a favourable environment for risk-taking. However, given unusual noise around the indicators at present, we are awaiting further confirmation of economic stabilisation over the coming months.
- Valuations: Valuations for equities – the largest source of risk and return in most strategies – remain challenging on absolute terms. The US equity market, equal to nearly 60% of the global total, is currently trading at a forward price-to-earnings multiple of 22x, the highest since 2002. That is expensive. However, with rates near zero, there is a good case for a higher than usual tolerance to valuations, particularly for large-cap companies that appear to be immune to the business cycle (“secular growth”). Moreover, when compared to cash or government bonds, equities still have a clear advantage in terms of long-term expected returns. Therefore, while equities are expensive, there are few alternatives amongst the core asset classes.
- Momentum: The second-quarter surge in equity markets is a case in point of why momentum is a critical factor in our asset allocation process. Markets don’t have to follow expectations, or even logic, and trends themselves can prove to be self-fulfilling. We view momentum on a slow-moving, month-end basis as it helps avoid whipsaw in oscillating markets, guiding us to take advantage of trends that have sufficient strength. As of the end of June, the global equity market just tipped into positive territory on the ten-month moving average metric that we favour. Should this be sustained, we will view it positively for risk-taking.
- Sentiment: Sentiment for risk assets has oscillated wildly over the last few months. Of the indicators we follow, some, such as the S&P 500 net speculative positions imply some bullishness. Others, such as the ten-year US treasury net speculative positions, imply more bearishness. Overall, we are in neutral territory.
Bottom line
Taking all the above into account, the Kleinwort Hambros Investment Committee has chosen, for now, to remain cautiously positioned in its risk allocations. Risk assets remain volatile (e.g. VIX near 30, well above its long-term average) and thus more unpredictable than usual; they are also expensive on most measures. Nonetheless, we note the economic regime and the momentum signals we follow have shifted towards increasing risk. These signals are often subject to reversal and far from perfect – this is especially true today given economic, policy and corporate earnings volatility. Nonetheless, should these signals continue to be supportive, we may seek to add risk in the months ahead. Should they reverse, or any of our other signals deteriorate, we may stay our hand or even lower our risk positions.
In any event, whatever the third and fourth quarter of this already extraordinary year will bring, our portfolios will be guided by our process, ready to capture upside or protect on the downside.
In accordance with the applicable regulation, we inform the reader that this material is qualified as a marketing document.
For more information on how Kleinwort Hambros can help you, please contact Sam Hartles, Private Banker - sam.hartles@kleinworthambros.com